The New Zealand Epiphyte Network
  • NZ Epiphyte Network
  • Field Guide
  • 2013 Epiphyte Workshop
    • 2013 Presentations
  • 2016 Epiphyte Workshop
    • 2016 Presentations
    • Discussion Summary
  • Epiphytes, vines & mistletoes explained
  • NZ epiphyte survey programme
  • Publications and links
  • Blog
  • Gallery
  • Contact us!

The last uninvaded frontier?

13/2/2014

3 Comments

 
The forest canopy is often referred to as the last unexplored frontier for biological science because there is still a lot to learn in this tree-top world.

However, I've come to realise that in this country full of naturalised exotic species it may also be the last uninvaded frontier. Thinking about all of the native plant life-forms (trees, shrubs, herbs, ferns, vines, epiphytes, mistletoes etc.), the epiphytes and mistletoes of the forest canopy are possibly the only group that aren't widely invaded by exotic species. 
New Zealand epiphytes
A beautiful vista of native canopy species. Photo: Olivia Henwood.
Why are exotic species largely absent from our forest canopies? Here are a few ideas:

Harsh habitat: the climatic extremes of the forest canopy likely restrict the opportunities for common exotic species to establish.

Habitat integrity: the majority of epiphyte habitat is in old-growth forests. These places have the large trees, high humidity and relatively stable climates that epiphytes and mistletoes thrive in. The lack of disturbance in these forests likely limits the invasion threat.

Not in favour: most exotic species in New Zealand are garden escapees that were brought from a garden setting in their homeland. I suspect that the lack of epiphytic species in these overseas gardens means that not many epiphytes have ever been brought here (thankfully).

Just wait: without intentional introductions, the invaders rely on accidental arrival. These largely haven't occurred yet but changes in global climate patterns might make this more likely.

But wait....

epiphytic fig
An exotic epiphytic fig in Auckland City. Photo: C. Kirby.
There are a few species that have begun naturalising in urban environments. The photo above shows an exotic epiphytic fig in an exotic palm tree in Auckland. This is a common sight around the city and a cause of concern for native urban bush fragments.
Picture
Weeding privet from a titoki in Hamilton City. Photo: Fiona Clarkson.
There are also species that are very good at taking the odd canopy opportunity! The photo above is of me with a privet seedling that I've removed from the trunk fork of a titoki in Hamilton City.  
Picture
An exotic orchid irresponsibly planted in a native forest patch. Photo: C. Kirby.
And finally, there are also some occasions where exotic orchids are intentionally introduced in forests. The idea is probably to "beautify" our native ecosystems but I personally don't see any logic here, especially considering the invasion risk. 

To finish, let's be clear on something: It is very undesirable to have ANY exotic species in our native forests. They displace native species, interrupt natural processes and restrict ecosystem functioning. They do not provide the services that our native fauna rely on and they threaten the integrity and resilience of these highly interwoven systems. Please take any opportunity you have to reduce these threats from exotic species.
3 Comments
Xerographica link
18/2/2014 06:12:34 pm

One thing I feel compelled to note is that it can't be the rule that introduced exotics decrease biodiversity. Or else each exotic plant introduced to the Hawaiian Islands over the past 28 million years would have reduced biodiversity. You can't have much biodiversity if every introduction results in the loss of one established species. Errr...you can't have any biodiversity because the second exotic plant species would simply have replaced the first...and the third species would have replaced the second...

It could certainly be prudent to play it safe by arguing against the introduction of any species anywhere...but I think the priority should really be determining why some introduced species increase, rather than decrease, biodiversity.

The first plant to establish in Hawaii was like the first person on the bus. They had their pick of seats. It would be surprising for the second person to board the bus and force the first person out of their seat. "Hey, that's my seat!" It's not the greatest analogy because we have to imagine people being better suited to certain seats on a bus.

How many seats (microhabitats) are there in Hawaii? We can imagine an epiphyte boarding the bus and seeing that all the seats were taken..."it's ok, I prefer sitting on the roof". Epiphytes have no problem sitting in really uncomfortable seats. That's why they really increase the biodiversity to space ratio.

When I spent three years in the jungles of Panama...I really can't say that I saw a lot of people sitting on top of the buses. Epiphytes were the exception rather than the rule. Then again, I spent most of my time on the "drier" Pacific side.

Oncidium cebolleta grows in the dry forests of the Americas and Dendrobium canaliculatum grows in the dry forests of Australia. I would be extremely surprised if their cross introductions resulted in the loss of biodiversity. There are plenty of empty uncomfortable seats. Or maybe they would say to each other like two old time western gunslingers..."this here town ain't big enough for the two of us".

Epiphytic orchids, unlike other epiphytes such as bromeliads, rarely ever have high density populations. Generally they are few and far between. For me this seems to indicate that the rule for introduced orchids will not be a reduction in biodiversity.

Not sure if I'm remembering/interpreting a paper correctly...but a study of established reed stem Epidendrums in Hawaii seemed to indicate that they've already started to noticeably differentiate in the past 50 or so years since they've naturalized. It's pretty amazing how quickly they've adapted to the selective pressures of a new environment. I wonder how long it would take for them to become a new subspecies...and eventually a new species.

Reply
Derrick
11/11/2014 09:46:58 am

Further to xerographica's most interesting comments, might I add that future climate change must surely change attitudes that are possibly too inclined to protect ecosystems that very probably will not have sufficient time to adapt to rapid climate changes. For example the many Australian trees already introduced here might prove far better survivors here than our natives. I expect only time will tell. I think we may be forced to import new species to keep 'wild' ecosystems viable, so lets hope our understandings of ecosystems are dramatically improved. Whether we like it or not trying to keep New Zealand pre Homo Sapiens is silly.

Reply
Epiphyte link
11/11/2014 12:55:38 pm

Derrick, the other day I tried to imagine how much carbon dioxide would be absorbed if every Phalaenopsis ended up on a tree rather than in the trash when it finished blooming. Unfortunately, even if the interest was there...the commonly available Phalaenopsis hybrids can't grow outside in places like California. On the other hand, pretty much every New Zealand epiphytic orchid can grow outdoors somewhere in California. If the cold tolerance of mass produced orchids could be improved...and many of them ended up on trees...then perhaps climate change could be reduced.

Right now I have four seed pods developing on my Neofinetia falcata hybrid that's growing on my Ficus macrophylla bonsai. The pollen came from two Phalaenopsis hybrids and one species. I'm hoping that the cross will have the best of both worlds...large, colorful flowers and temperature tolerance.

New Zealand has two epiphytic monopodial orchids that I know of...

Drymoanthus adversus
Drymoanthus flavus

Are they more cold tolerant than Neofinetia falcata? I don't know. I don't know anybody outside of New Zealand that grows them...or any other native NZ orchid for that matter. For all I know they could be the key to reducing climate change.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Subscribe to NZ Epiphyte Blog:

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Like us on Facebook!
    Picture

    Catherine Kirby

    I work with NZ's native vascular epiphytes at the University of Waikato. I completed an MSc on epiphyte ecology and the shrub epiphyte Griselinia lucida and have recently published the Field Guide to NZ's Epiphytes, Vines & Mistletoes. 


    For me, the highlights of epiphyte research are the many unknowns, the amazing way that these plants survive in the canopy, and of course tree climbing!

    Subscribe to receive the weekly posts and join our facebook page to get interesting updates :)


    Categories

    All
    Canopy Research
    Epiphyte Classification
    International Epiphytes
    NZ Epiphyte Network
    NZ's Epiphytes


    Archives

    August 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.